Which of the following would likely be considered a claim under torts to realty?

The reasoning behind choosing the scenario involving planting trees that block sunlight from a neighbor’s garden as a claim under torts to realty lies in the legal principle of nuisance and property rights. Torts to realty generally involve actions that interfere with a person's right to use and enjoy their property. When one party's actions unjustly encroach upon another's property rights, it can lead to a tort claim.

In this case, planting trees that block sunlight can be seen as an actionable interference with the neighbor's enjoyment of their property. Such interference can affect the neighbor's ability to grow plants, access natural sunlight, and enjoy their garden. This exemplifies a situation where one homeowner's use of their property adversely impacts another, justifying the potential for a legal claim.

The other scenarios, while potentially problematic or contentious, do not typically fit the legal definitions associated with torts to realty. Verbal altercations generally fall under personal torts rather than property torts, excessive noise at a concert could be a public nuisance but doesn't directly involve a realty claim, and collecting rainwater from a roof pertains more to local property laws rather than a tort claim affecting a neighbor's use of their property. Thus, the activity of blocking sunlight through landscaping